Digital Assets Report

Newsletter

Like this article?

Sign up to our free newsletter

Moving the needle

Related Topics

Luxembourg continues to push the innovation agenda for asset managers and investors. And with a rich heritage supporting UCITS, the Grand Duchy is building substance under AIFMD to further enhance its reputation as the EU’s leading fund distribution centre.

Charting the rise of innovation

Luxembourg has continuously risen to the challenges of market evolution over the years. So much so that, in many respects, it has become the shining light for how a funds jurisdiction needs to operate in today's highly regulated environment. Year after year, the Grand Duchy has updated its legislation and introduced new fund structures to keep ahead of the needs of global asset managers.

According to Monterey Insight*, an independent fund research company, there were 3,275 registered Specialised Investment Funds (SIFs) with an aggregate AuM of USD424.5 billion at the end of 2015. 

The number of registered AIFMs (those that fall below the EUR100 million threshold levered, EUR500 million unlevered) since AIFMD was introduced in 2013 has grown to 604, whilst total AuM for alternative investment funds is approximately EUR548 billion. 

For a jurisdiction that has long been associated as the world's preeminent UCITS jurisdiction (65% of UCITS funds distributed on a cross-border basis are domiciled in Luxembourg according to PwC figures), the Grand Duchy is successfully navigating its way under AIFMD to becoming an important onshore alternative investment fund centre. 

"The approach in Luxembourg has always been forward looking with respect to fund regulation over the last three decades," explains Nathalie Dogniez (pictured), Partner at PwC (Luxembourg). "The framework under AIFMD in Luxembourg was introduced to accommodate the needs of asset managers. Being responsive has always been the mindset of the Luxembourg authorities."

She says that the Luxembourg framework has always been "and continues to be" judicious in how it views the toolset of fund structures available to ensure that they fit the purposes of asset managers. 

There has been a clear arc of innovation over the last 12 years. Back in 2004, the Société d'investissement en capital à risqué (SICAR) was introduced, primarily as a vehicle to support private equity and venture capital investments. 

Three years later, the SIF was introduced and has proven to be a great success for those managers wishing to set up and distribute onshore regulated fund structures either as standalone funds, or as umbrella SICAV structures to support multiple compartments or sub-funds. 

Next came a much-needed update to Luxembourg's limited partnership regime in tandem with the introduction of AIFMD in 2013. Previously, there were two forms of limited partnership:

• Common limited partnership (SCS) or société en commandite simple;

• Corporate partnership limited by shares (SCA) or société en commandite par actions.

Neither, however, offered private equity and real estate managers the chance to set up entities without legal personality, as per the widely adopted UK Limited Partnership model. Luxembourg acted quickly and introduced the special limited partnership (SCSp), or société en commandite speciale. More than 1,000 limited partnerships, both regulated and unregulated, have been registered since 2013. 

"Luxembourg does so much cross-border business that we tend to get the best-in-class versions of what other markets offer. For example, the SCSp was introduced to complement the Anglo-Saxon LP model, and the structure, unlike the SCS, has no legal personality. As a jurisdiction, we are flexible enough to make sure that we have in our laws the legal forms which are preferred by Japanese investors, German investors, UK investors and so on. The LP regime has proved to be a tremendous success," says Marc-Andre Bechet, Director Legal & Tax at the Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry (ALFI).

Fast forward another three years and once again Luxembourg has hit the innovation button with the introduction of the Reserved Alternative Investment Fund or 'RAIF'; more detail on this is provided later in the report. In brief, the RAIF is an unregulated product. Supervision and compliance is placed on the shoulders of the authorised AIFM. 

"This latest initiative shows Luxembourg's ability and willingness to adapt to a new framework and anticipate asset managers' needs. Luxembourg is filling the gap between regulated fund products and unregulated fund products with the introduction of the RAIF," remarks Dogniez. 

Luxembourg’s competitive advantage 

That ability to respond proactively to the needs of the market is easier said than done. Few other jurisdictions, if any, have built a marketplace to service, distribute and manage investment funds (by manage, meaning operationally as opposed to portfolio management) from a single hub. 

"As we are a cross-border centre, by definition we have investors and asset managers coming from a large number of markets. Therefore, we have to accommodate them based on the needs they have in their respective home jurisdictions. Our most recent innovation, the RAIF, has been developed in the spirit of the AIFMD. But aside from legal structure innovation, one should also consider operational innovation and technology in Luxembourg," suggests Bechet. 

Innovation is key to making things more efficient and quick to produce. This is especially important when one looks at areas such as KIID production under UCITS and the KID, which will be needed under PRIIPS. Technology systems need to be properly in place to produce these fund documents for different markets, in different languages. Some providers in Luxembourg are now servicing non-Luxembourg funds "because we have the infrastructure in place to make things more cost-efficient," adds Bechet. 

Building substance under UCITS

Since Luxembourg first started servicing UCITS funds 30 years ago, it has taken great effort to create an infrastructure capable of supporting the global distribution needs of asset managers. 

"Luxembourg was the first country to implement the UCITS I Directive and it has always had a dynamic approach with the Government and the CSSF. We believed in the ability for Luxembourg to develop and become a third party servicing area. We occupied an area of the market that needed to be occupied. There was never a plan to become a competitor to London or Frankfurt or New York by attracting fund manager talent but rather to service the asset management industry," explains José-Benjamin Longrée, Partner, Global Fund Distribution at PwC (Luxembourg). 

Over time, Luxembourg has built substance with transfer agencies, fund administrators, custodians. Today, State Street, J.P. Morgan Bank, BNP Paribas, BNY Mellon and RBC Investor & Treasury Services make up the top five fund administrators. PwC is the leading auditor, advising more than 5,700 funds, with Arendt & Medernach leading the charge in legal advisory, with more than 3,600 funds on their books. 

With a plethora of top-class financial institutions in place to service and distribute funds, Luxembourg is also able to draw upon a deep pool of talent, able to service the rest of Europe with a multi-cultural workforce fluent in English, German, French, Italian and Spanish. 

"In 1990, Luxembourg realised it couldn't create a marketplace by itself so it invited people from the UK, the US, France, etc, to come here to establish their funds in an environment that was very stable, from a tax point of view. Luxembourg is an ideal hub for private and institutional investors from all over the world thanks to its stability as well as its innovative and international orientation," says Longrée. 

Furthermore as an AAA-rated economy, Luxembourg has sound public finances and is politically stable. 

FinTech innovation

Bechet points out that there is also a third area of evolution, aside from IT infrastructure and legal structuring; Financial Technology: "FinTech is a bit of a buzzword but we have a strategy in place for this in Luxembourg for the funds industry. Take for example the issue of doing KYC on investors. This is very labour intensive and time consuming. By making the KYC process more digital it would ease the process for the benefit of both asset managers and investors. I think FinTech will also be an important area of growth and innovation, going forward."

Evolving Luxembourg’s fund structuring framework

Every time Luxembourg has added a new tool to the toolbox it has done so to overcome a specific challenge faced by asset managers. The following will detail current regulatory developments to demonstrate how the Grand Duchy's funds framework continues to innovate in line with the needs of the global fund industry it supports. 

SIF update

Specialised investment funds can be established as an FCP, a Luxembourg Common Fund that has no legal personality and managed by a management company, or as an investment company with variable capital (Luxembourg SICAV). Earlier this year, the Luxembourg government took measures to amend SIF Law of February 13, 2007 (as well as amendments to SICAR Law and UCI Law). 

With respect to the SIF regime, funds can invest in any type of asset class no matter how illiquid or esoteric. Under SIF Law, only investors classified as 'well-informed investors are able to invest in SIFs. These are defined as either: professional investors as defined under annex II of MiFID II; institutional investors (i.e. pension funds); or investors that confirm in writing that they qualify as well-informed investors. 

The Luxembourg government has, however, amended the SIF Law such that only those investors considered as professional investors are permissible to invest in SIFs holding exotic or hard to value assets. This is in some ways an attempt to protect the SIF regime to guard against investors allocating into funds whose risk profile they may not fully understand. 

The Reserved AIF (‘RAIF’)

Rather more excitement has been generated by the introduction of the Reserved AIF under the Luxembourg Bill of law n∞6929 (Bill 6929) As previously mentioned, local regulation up until this point has focused exclusively on product regulation under the UCITS regime and SIF regime. As AIFMD is manager-focused regulation, Luxembourg's authorities have moved swiftly to introduce an unregulated fund that requires no CSSF approval. Full supervision is required by an authorised AIFM. 

"The RAIF is able to benefit from the AIFMD passport, meaning the authorised AIFM can be located anywhere in Europe. At the same time, because it is not a supervised product it doesn't need to go through the product approval process with the CSSF, making speed to market a lot quicker. The RAIF is very much in the spirit of the AIFMD," explains Dogniez. 

"We've been getting interest from clients across the globe once it was announced that the RAIF was being introduced and now that the law has gone live on June 28, several RAIFs have been launched and we are expecting many more now that the summer holidays are over."

The RAIF will not necessarily replace existing fund structures such as the SIF and the SICAR – after all, these are well-established structures, and there will continue to be European investors with a greater preference for regulated fund vehicles because of fiduciary or local regulatory restrictions. 

"I think we are targeting something different with the RAIF i.e. fund managers who are not yet present in Europe and which are targeting institutional investors," suggests Bechet. "We travel to Asia, to the US, and we've heard from local asset managers that they are not yet using European structures, with one of their biggest concerns being the cost element. The double layer of cost between the fund product and the AIFM may have been delaying the decision by non-EU managers to set up structures up in Europe."

As a RAIF must appoint an authorised AIFM it cannot be managed by a sub-threshold AIFM (someone with fewer than EUR100 million in AuM) who has not opted-in for the AIFM status. One way to overcome this is for the investment manager to appoint a third party or 'hosted' AIFM and act in a sub-advisory capacity to the RAIF. 

ESMA has now assessed 12 non-EU jurisdictions against the regulatory criteria to be considered, namely investor protection, competition, potential market disruption and the monitoring of systemic risk. It delivered positive, unqualified advice in respect of Canada, Guernsey, Japan, Jersey and Switzerland, concluding that no significant obstacles exist to the extension of the passport to these jurisdictions.

Qualified approval has been given to Australia, Bermuda, Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, Singapore and the United States.

"I think ESMA's advice is a positive sign for managers and investors as well as Luxembourg. Managers will be able to stream-line their operations without the duplication of substance or locations and investors who want an AIFMD-compliant product will have access to an expanded suite of investment strategies. Luxembourg is perfectly positioned to take advantage of this through the use of one of the many different forms of very flexible investment vehicles, including the new RAIF, not to mention our ever expanding capabilities to service any asset class," says Michael Delano, Partner, PwC (Luxembourg).

The Special Limited Partnership (SCSp)

When the Special Limited Partnership (SCSp) was introduced in 2013 in tandem with the AIFMD, Luxembourg effectively sought to modernise what was quite an antiquated limited partnership regime in the SCS (société en commandite simple), based on the 1915 company law. 

Previously, the unregulated market was dominated by so-called SOPARFIs (société de participations financières) – private holding companies that limit themselves to small groups of investors and remained outside the scope of supervision of Luxembourg's regulator, the CSSF. 

The SCSp now adds to Luxembourg's toolbox and is available to both unregulated structures and regulated funds. Its appeal is largely based on the fact that it mirrors the Anglo Saxon model of organising a limited partnership. More than 1,000 limited partnerships have been established since 2013 and is yet another demonstration of where Luxembourg innovation has been prevailing.

"People are looking at the SCSp as a way to structure SIFs as well as unregulated limited partnerships. Fund promoters will be able to use the SCSp structure to launch RAIFs as well," notes Dogniez.

A Hub for Global Distribution Strategies 

It is this commitment to fund innovation that has helped Luxembourg become the world's leading cross-border distribution centre. As the gateway to Europe, it has attracted fund managers from the rest of Europe, the US and Asia. Moreover, with the granting of a RMB50 billion Qualified Foreign Institutional Investor ('RQFII') quota by the People's Bank of China in April 2015, it has enabled international and Chinese fund promoters to set up RQFII funds through Luxembourg domiciled vehicles with a Luxembourg entity being awarded an RQFII licence and quota. 

When UCITS III regulation was introduced in 2003, one of the updates made was to introduce a Manager passport for management companies running UCITS funds to market their services to the whole of the EU from one EU Member State. "At the time I remember people saying, 'This is the end for Luxembourg! People will need to have management substance and will chose to go somewhere else'. This simply didn't happen. Overnight there were more than 200 management companies licensed managing funds that were being distributed on a cross-border basis," explains Longrée. 

Under the UCITS regime, asset managers increasingly gravitated towards Luxembourg, thanks to its substance and distribution capabilities, and as Longrée confirms, "we've seen a lot of our clients make the strategic decision to create their structure in Luxembourg in order to oversee their whole distribution and marketing strategy".

Then came the evolution of the UCITS regime four or five years ago. Suddenly, alternative fund managers, keen to widen their investor base, started structuring 'alternative UCITS' funds out of Luxembourg. This proved successful and ushered in the trend of the Liquid Alternative, which the US fund management industry subsequently embraced with the '40 Act alternative mutual fund. 

AIFM growth

But the AIFMD was a whole different proposition. Unlike the UCITS regime, which is fund-focused regulation, the AIFMD sought to introduce regulation at the manager level; specifically on alternative investment fund managers. Luxembourg started to become an attractive proposition for global alternative fund managers, not only to structure alternative UCITS funds, but to structure AIFs for private equity, real estate, infrastructure and illiquid hedge fund strategies; basically, any investment strategy that could not ordinarily avail of the UCITS regime.

The CSSF, thanks to its expertise and flexibility, has allowed Luxembourg's regulated alternative investment funds market to evolve, with Longrée explaining: "When alternative fund managers started to see the AIF as a distribution product rather than just an investment product, Luxembourg began to grow. Today, there are large numbers of AIFs being created and distributed to sophisticated investors across Europe. 

"The latest development with the RAIF could only have been created in a mature environment. That couldn't have happened 10 or 15 years ago."

Under AIFMD, because the regulation focuses on the manager, it has meant that Luxembourg has been able to take advantage of the strong level of substance it has built over the years and become not only a distribution hub for both UCITS and AIFs, but, increasingly, a manager hub, or in AIFMD parlance, an 'AIFM' hub.

This is critical for Luxembourg's ability to attract global fund managers who need not only fund distribution support, but management company support; everything from operational and risk management to marketing and compliance management. The number of AIFMs continues to rise in Luxembourg, with some existing UCITS management companies expanding their license to support AIFs and operate as "Super ManCos". 

Point being, Luxembourg could not have supported such a development without already having created an extensive funds ecosystem under UCITS.

"European fund distribution is still our core business but we have grown tremendously as regards worldwide distribution – in Asia, in Latin America. We've even started distributing funds in some African countries. In the mid-90s there were already 600 Luxembourg funds registered in Hong Kong. It's a long process though. Luxembourg has been present in Hong Kong, Singapore far longer than it has in Chile, for example, but our presence there, and in other South American countries, thanks to conferences and events organised by ALFI, is causing them to look closely at Luxembourg funds. 

"Just as the Luxembourg UCITS fund is a global brand, the AIF is slowly starting to develop into a brand. As such, whenever there is a regulatory change or development, we need to be careful that it not only touches our intra-European scope, but also touches our global scope in markets like Hong Kong and Santiago," outlines Longrée. 

The pumping heart of fund distribution

The next step for Luxembourg, says Longrée, is to help asset managers located in the US, in Asia, who do not necessarily know how to tackle distribution channels in Europe, to figure out the best strategy.

There is, he says, a big opportunity in terms of asset raising "but they fear that they're not going to recognise the right distribution channel or EU country to start off with. Even a US fund manager with more than USD1 billion in AuM might feel they do not have the right connections or know the best market to target. Now we are helping these non-EU managers find the best distribution route into Europe based on the way they have succeeded in their own domestic marketplace." 

As such, there is an increasing trend to use Luxembourg as a hub around which to organise one's global distribution strategy using a range of legal structures that can support the requirements of global asset managers. 

People setting up funds in Luxembourg are doing so for the brand – a Luxembourg fund is recognised by investors globally and there is a cost benefit to having one's distribution strategy operate out of one market. Luxembourg does its part, just as the local service providers in those markets the fund(s) is being distributed into, do theirs. 

"I think the beauty of the model is that the investment manager and distributors are located outside of Luxembourg, with Luxembourg in the middle acting as the control tower, as it were. Other European markets did not see distribution as the main goal. But Luxembourg has always tried to position itself as the pumping heart of fund distribution. We serve an important purpose, and that has been the secret of our success, giving asset managers the services they need to run their funds," states Longrée.

Luxembourg adapting to EU regulation 

Luxembourg didn't want to miss the train with respect to AIFMD. There are now thousands of AIF registrations. 

When the Directive first came out, people thought it would be very expensive because of all the reporting and data collection requirements. But service providers have gone some way to spreading the burden of costs and this has encouraged investment managers to look at AIFs as a distribution product. 

Some of the largest asset managers have created ranges of AIFs in order to distribute them in Europe. According to Monterey Insight, in the AIFM rankings, Deka International holds first position with total net assets of USD27.0 billion followed by Universal Investment Luxembourg (USD17.8 billion) and Pictet Asset Management (Europe) (USD17.6 billion). 

"We are seeing managers setting up operations in Luxembourg and building substance, including making investment decisions. It's not only risk management and compliance staff within the AIFM, we are also seeing investment committees where the expert on private equity, or on real estate, is based in Luxembourg and the investment advisor is located where the deals are being sourced," observes Bechet. 

One important area of current evolution, that applies more broadly at an EU level, relates to loan origination. 

There is a common misconception that loan origination funds were not allowed in Luxembourg, but as Dogniez is quick to clarify, such funds first began appearing as micro finance products in the late 90s, and were accepted by the CSSF. 

"They were set up as Part II funds or SIFs without requiring asset managers to have a bank license," says Dogniez.

On 9th June 2016, the CSSF published an updated Q&A on alternative investment funds (AIFs) engaging in loan origination, loan participation and/or loan acquisition activities in and from Luxembourg. "The update on its AIFM Law FAQ highlights the requirements that the regulator seeks before accepting applications from fund managers," says Dogniez. This demonstrates how important the CSSF views the loan origination market, and Luxembourg's role in supporting loan origination AIFs. 

ELTIF Regulation

This is a wise position to take given that the European Union is preparing to introduce the European Long Term Investment Fund ('ELTIF'); a pan-European regulatory development that will allow ELTIFs to engage in loan origination "with the condition being that the loans being issued are not themselves financed by loans. The capital has to come from shareholders in the ELTIF. 

"Luxembourg has proven that it can adapt to the needs of asset managers and has done well to consistently adjust to the needs of the market. This has helped maintain its competitiveness," concludes Dogniez. 

With its 30-plus year heritage of supporting UCITS cross-border funds, Luxembourg is well placed to attract AIFs (and AIFMs) and become the world's pre-eminent fund distribution centre for both traditional and alternative funds as it continues to move the needle of innovation. 

 


*Press release, 23 May 2016 

 

Like this article? Sign up to our free newsletter

Most Popular

Further Reading

Featured