Sign up for free newsletter

 

Jim Cass, SEI

Investors in alternative investments driving change in manager behaviour, says SEI survey


Alternative investments managers are enjoying continued interest from investors but risk losing out from future flows, warns SEI (NASDAQ: SEIC) in its latest pair of research reports.

Superior returns, trusted investment teams, and firm size have traditionally served as the key differentiators in the alternative investments world, but changes in the industry have profound implications for how alternative managers run their businesses and the infrastructure required to support their investment acumen.
 
Released today and based on a survey of 70 alternatives investors, “How to Meet Operational Challenges while Pursuing Opportunities in Alternative Investing” illustrates the alignments and disconnects between those investors and the managers with whom they allocate capital. This investor-focussed edition comes on the heels of a similar report released in September, “Finding Success as Alternatives Converge,” that addressed how investment managers could take advantage of the opportunities and avoid the challenges resulting from investors’ increasing interest in alternative investments. Both reports were done in coordination with Preqin, a U.K.-based source of data and intelligence in the alternative assets industry.
 
Experts predict continued growth in alternative assets for the foreseeable future. However, as asset classes converge, investment vehicles evolve, and business models change, investors and managers alike are uncertain how to best take advantage of this positive outlook. The survey confirmed that while evaluation of a manager’s investment acumen remained critical, operational considerations are becoming more prominent. Growing institutional demand has been accompanied by increasingly diverse and complicated portfolio holdings for many investors, consisting of stakes in a mix of limited partnerships, co-investments, and direct holdings, which bring oversight and administrative challenges of their own.
 
“We are pleased to see a continued demand for institutional investment products,” says Jim Cass (pictured), Senior Vice President of SEI’s Investment Manager Services division. “As the industry becomes more sophisticated and complex, the winners will be those managers who can close the gaps between investors’ expectations and current reality by bolstering their operational capabilities, while also supporting their portfolio management expertise with a streamlined and technologically-supported investor experience.”
 
The surveys also exposed several areas where perceptions differed from investor to manager. The trend toward greater transparency is well established, but expectations continue to outpace reality, as many investors remain dissatisfied with the level of transparency available to them. While 67 per cent of managers surveyed thought existing levels of transparency surrounding operating expenses were sufficient, only 25 per cent of investors agreed. Additionally, almost nine out of 10 investors say it was important (or extremely important) that they are given the opportunity to negotiate fees, yet this negotiation occurred far more often with the larger investor than with those at lower asset levels: 73 per cent of investors with more than USD25 billion of assets reported they had success negotiating fees compared to only 29 per cent of those with less than USD1 billion of assets.

 

specialreports
other gfm publications