Wed, 02/04/2014 - 13:21
By Brian Kelliher & David Lawless, Dillon Eustace – Since the establishment of the International Financial Services Centre in Ireland in 1988, Ireland has become a domicile of choice for asset managers seeking to establish regulated funds for distribution worldwide.
Over 430 global fund promoters have used Ireland as a fund domicile in order to establish regulated funds. As of 31 December 2013, there were 5,599 Irish domiciled funds with assets of approximately EUR1.344trn1. Such funds are regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland (the “Central Bank”), which is the competent authority with responsibility for the authorisation and supervision of funds established in Ireland.
In addition, in recent years Ireland has been the fastest growing international fund administration centre. As of 31 December 2013, Irish administrators serviced 12,889 Irish and non-Irish domiciled funds with assets under administration in excess of EUR2.7trn2. Ireland is also the largest hedge fund administration centre in the world with over 43% of global hedge fund assets serviced in Ireland3.
The setting of the first ICAV seeds
The Irish Government acknowledged in 2011 in its Strategy for the International Financial Services Industry 2011-20164 that despite the success of the Irish funds industry, there were challenges that needed to be addressed. One of the challenges identified was product competitiveness.
Although Irish domiciled funds may be structured in many legal forms, depending on whether they are structured as UCITS funds or non-UCITS funds (“AIFs”) (e.g. common contractual funds, unit trusts, variable capital companies or investment limited partnerships), it was noticeable that Ireland as a leading international fund domicile did not offer a corporate fund structure similar to the SICAV in other EU jurisdictions.
In this regard, the Government undertook in its 2011 strategy paper to introduce a legal framework for a corporate fund structure which is a not a company required to be incorporated under the Irish Companies Acts. Currently Irish domiciled funds structured as companies (such as variable capital companies) are incorporated under the Irish Companies Acts and are consequently established as public limited companies which are distinguishable by the words “public limited company” or “Plc” appearing at the end of the name of the company.
ICAV – the beginning
In keeping with the Irish Government’s commitment, the Irish Minister for Finance, Michael Noonan, published on the 20th December 2013 the General Scheme of the Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle (ICAV) Bill (“General Scheme of the ICAV Bill”), which provides for a new corporate fund structure to be known as the Irish Collective Asset-management Vehicle or “ICAV”.
On the publication of the General Scheme of the ICAV Bill, the Minister of Finance commented: “This is a significant milestone in delivering a new corporate vehicle for investment funds which will be more suited to the needs of the global funds industry. The ICAV will help the Irish funds industry to compete for new sources of business. I intend to push ahead with the drafting of the Bill as a matter of priority.”
The principal rationale for introducing a legal framework, to facilitate fund promoters / asset managers who wish to establish an Irish regulated ICAV, is to enhance Ireland’s competitiveness. However it is acknowledged that such enhancement will only be realised if the ICAV presents tangible benefits to global fund promoters / asset managers. In this regard, the following benefits are notable:
Features of the ICAV5
It is envisaged that the ICAV will have some common features with Corporate Fund PLCs:
However it is also envisaged that the ICAV will have features which distinguish it from Corporate Fund PLCs:
In addition to the above features, existing Corporate Fund PLCs will be able to convert to an ICAV and funds domiciled outside of Ireland will be able to re-domicile into Ireland by continuation as ICAVs.
ICAVs and US Investors
While the introduction of the ICAV will have some welcoming legal features which will distinguish it from Corporate Fund PLCs, the original driver for the introduction of the ICAV is to add an additional choice of legal entity (which a fund can take the form of) for fund promoters to accommodate both US taxable investors and US tax-exempts in the same investment fund without creating a potential US tax disadvantage for either type of US investor. It is expected that non-US investors should be tax neutral as to whether to invest in an ICAV or Corporate Fund PLC.
A US taxable investor investing in an offshore fund that is treated as a corporation for US federal tax purposes, may face certain adverse US tax consequences. Most offshore funds are considered ‘passive foreign investment companies’ (“PFIC”) for US federal income tax purposes. While PFIC classification need not necessarily in all circumstances give rise to adverse US tax consequences for US taxable investors, typically PFIC classification (even in the event of a fund electing to be a “qualifying electing fund”) will reduce the attractiveness of the offshore fund for many US taxable investors. For that reason many fund promoters will only distribute an offshore fund to US taxable investors if such a fund can “check-the-box” to be treated as a partnership or disregarded entity for US tax purposes.
A Corporate Fund PLC is by default treated as a corporate entity for US tax purposes and cannot elect (unlike a unit trust) to be treated as a partnership for US tax purposes. This typically puts an onus on fund promoters to use either unit trusts or investment limited partnerships if they wish to attract US taxable investors.
It is expected that an ICAV should by default be treated as a corporate entity for US tax purposes, however (unlike a Corporate Fund PLC) it should have the ability to check-the-box to be treated as a partnership (if more than one investor) or disregarded entity (if only one investor) for US tax purposes. Therefore, the introduction of the ICAV should give fund promoters an additional option as to what legal entity they wish to use when establishing a fund which may have US taxable investors.
Where fund promoters wish to establish a master/feeder fund structure to accommodate both US taxable and US tax-exempt investors, the introduction of the ICAV should provide the option for the master fund to be formed as an ICAV as opposed to a unit trust or investment limited partnership. The feeder fund (for US tax-exempt investors and non-US investors) will be able to be formed as an ICAV, Corporate Fund PLC, unit trust or investment limited partnership as all 4 types of legal entities should be able to be treated as a corporate entity for US tax purposes.
Having received feedback on the General Scheme of the ICAV Bill from stakeholders including inter alia the Central Bank, Office of the Director of Corporate Enforcement and the Irish funds industry, the Irish Department of Finance has instructed the parliamentary counsel to draft the full text of the ICAV Bill. Once the ICAV Bill is published, it will be reviewed by the Houses of the Irish Parliament before being enacted into Irish law.
Although there is no prescribed timeframe, it is expected that the applicable legislation will be enacted before the end of 2014 as a result of the priority given to the legislation by the Irish Government to date and the input by relevant stakeholders in the process to date.
Brian Kelliher, Tel: +353-1-6731721, Email: email@example.com
David Lawless, Tel: +353-1-6731765, Email: firstname.lastname@example.org
5. Although the principal features of the ICAV are not expected to change given the commitment of the Irish Government and the level of input to date by relevant stakeholders, it should be noted that, as part of the legislative process, a number of reviews will take place by both Houses of the Irish Parliament once the ICAV Bill is published which may result in amendments.
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 16:59
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 16:53
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 12:00
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 10:12
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 09:09
Fri, 03/Jul/2015 - 06:00
Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:00:00 GMTCompliance Officer, Vice President, Private Banking
Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 GMTCredit Risk AVP/VP | Singapore
Fri, 03 Jul 2015 00:00:00 GMT