Institutional investors appear committed to hedge fund investing, but hedge fund managers will face wider-ranging and more in-depth scrutiny of operations and investment processes, acco
Institutional investors appear committed to hedge fund investing, but hedge fund managers will face wider-ranging and more in-depth scrutiny of operations and investment processes, according to a survey by SEI and Greenwich Associates.
The survey report, entitled Hedge Funds under the Microscope: Examining Institutional Commitment in Challenging Times, points to a need for greater transparency and enhanced client reporting and communications from hedge fund managers.
These are especially needed in the wake of changing institutional expectations brought on by the worst year on record for hedge fund performance.
SEI collaborated on the survey with Greenwich Associates, initially polling institutional investors in Continental Europe, the UK and the US at the end of August. As the financial crisis deepened, the firms re-interviewed respondents in November, to gauge the impact of market turmoil on institutional attitudes and plans concerning hedge funds.
The initial survey revealed that over 90 per cent of institutions polled either increased or maintained their allocations to hedge funds in the last two years. That sentiment remained largely unchanged in November when three out of four investors re-surveyed said they had taken ‘no action’ in response to the crisis.
When asked why, 83 per cent of those taking no action indicated their commitment to hedge funds has remained unchanged. The remaining respondents had investments that were subject to lock-up provisions.
At the same time, while the percentage planning to increase target allocations dropped significantly between the first- and second-round surveys (signalling a period of reassessment), only one institution reported lowering its target hedge fund allocation between the first and second rounds.
‘The silver lining for hedge fund managers is that institutions appear committed to hedge funds as an asset class,’ says Phil Masterson, managing director for SEI’s investment manager services division. ‘However, it’s not an unconditional commitment. Hedge fund managers must recognise and react to the changing expectations of their institutional clients. Greater transparency and enhanced client reporting and communications – along with fulfilling investor performance expectations – will be the pillars of a hedge fund manager’s success.’
Performance has regained its spot as the top institutional investor concern, with more than 80 per cent of second-round respondents citing poor performance as their biggest concern regarding hedge funds.
In a similar survey conducted by SEI in 2007, institutional investors had ranked performance as their third-biggest worry, behind headline risk and transparency. Investors also cited lack of liquidity, funds not achieving their stated objectives and headline risk as top concerns.
While portfolio transparency was named by just one out of four institutions as a ‘very important’ selection factor in the first-round survey, investors named portfolio transparency as the number one investment criteria demanding more weight in the second survey. Among second-round participants planning to decrease allocations by at least ten per cent, the top-ranking reason was lack of transparency.
‘Transparency has always been a central concern for institutions investing in hedge funds, but it has taken on added importance in the wake of the financial crisis,’ says Rodger Smith, head of the strategic consulting group at Greenwich Associates. ‘It’s likely that institutions will become even more demanding on this count in light of the intense publicity surrounding the Madoff affair.’
