The International Organization of Securities Commissions’ Technical Committee has published a final report recommending regulatory actions to assist financial market regulators in intro
The International Organization of Securities Commissions’ Technical Committee has published a final report recommending regulatory actions to assist financial market regulators in introducing greater transparency and oversight with respect to securitisation and credit default swaps markets.
The Task Force was formed in November 2008 in response to G20 calls for a review of the scope of financial markets and in particular unregulated financial market segments and products.
Kathleen Casey, chairman of Iosco’s Technical Committee, says: ‘Iosco acknowledges that financial innovation will always be a hallmark of a vibrant financial system, however such innovation need not, and should not occur at the cost of investor protection and market confidence.
‘The recommendations contained in this final report are aimed at restoring investor confidence and at improving the functioning, integrity and oversight of unregulated financial market segments and products, such as securitisation and credit default swaps, and international financial markets generally.’
The final recommendations contained in the report address issues of concern with respect to securitised products, including asset-backed securities, asset-backed commercial paper and structured credit products such as collateralised debt obligations, synthetic CDOs, and collateralised loan obligations; and CDS.
Securitisation
Final recommendation 1 – Wrong incentives
Iosco acknowledges industry responses in the securitisation market and recommends the following regulatory responses:
1. Consider requiring originators and/or sponsors to retain a long-term economic exposure to the securitisation in order to appropriately align interests in the securitisation value chain;
2. Require enhanced transparency through disclosure by issuers to investors of all verification and risk assurance practices that have been performed or undertaken by the underwriter, sponsor, and/or originator;
3. Require independence of service providers engaged by, or on behalf of, an issuer, where an opinion or service provided by a service provider may influence an investor’s decision to acquire a securitised product; and
4. Require service providers to issuers to maintain the currency of reports, where appropriate, over the life of the securitised product.
Final recommendation 2 – Inadequate risk management practices
Iosco acknowledges industry responses in the securitisation market and recommends the following regulatory responses:
1. Provide regulatory support for improvements in disclosure by issuers to investors including initial and ongoing information about underlying asset pool performance. Disclosure should also include details of the creditworthiness of the person(s) with direct or indirect liability to the issuer;
2. Review investor suitability requirements as well as the definition of sophisticated investor in the relevant market and strengthen these requirements, as appropriate, in the context of the relevant market; and
3. Encourage the development of tools by investors to assist in understanding complex financial products.
Final recommendation 3 – Regulatory structure and oversight issues
Iosco recommends that jurisdictions should assess the scope of their regulatory reach and consider which enhancements are needed to regulatory powers to support TC recommendation #1 and #2 in a manner promoting international coordination of regulation.
Credit default swaps
Final recommendation 4 – Counterparty risk and lack of transparency
Iosco encourages industry responses in the CDS market and recommends the following regulatory responses:
1. Provide sufficient regulatory structure, where relevant, for the establishment of CCPs to clear standardised CDS, including requirements to ensure: a) appropriate financial resources and risk management practices to minimise risk of CCP failure; b) CCPs make available transaction and market information that would inform the market and regulators; and c) cooperation with regulators;
2. Encourage financial institutions and market participants to work on standardising CDS contracts to facilitate CCP clearing;
3. The CPSS-Iosco Recommendations for Central Counterparties should be updated and take into account issues arising from the central clearing of CDS;
4. Facilitate appropriate and timely disclosure of CDS data relating to price, volume and open-interest by market participants, electronic trading platforms, data providers and data warehouses;
5. Support efforts to facilitate information sharing and regulatory cooperation between Iosco members and other supervisory bodies in relation to CDS market information and regulation; and
6. Encourage market participants’ engagement in industry initiatives for operational efficiencies.
Final Recommendation 5 – Regulatory structure and oversight issues
Iosco recommends that jurisdictions should assess the scope of their regulatory reach and consider which enhancements to regulatory powers are needed to support TC recommendation #4 in a manner promoting international coordination of regulation.
Iosco believes that the recommendations relating to CDS might be used, or tailored, to inform general recommendations for other unregulated financial markets and products, in particular, standardised and non-standardised OTC derivative products where such products may pose systemic risks to international finance markets or could contribute to restoring investor confidence.
