Forward Features Calendar

Share this article?

Newsletter

Like this article?

Sign up to our free newsletter

RBS Securities to pay USD35m penalty over fraudulent securities trading scheme

Related Topics

Global securities firm RBS Securities is to pay a USD35 million penalty relating to the company’s fraudulent trading through its now-defunct US Asset-Backed Securities, Mortgage-Backed Securities and Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Trading group.

The penalty is part of a non-prosecution agreement reached with the US Attorney’s Office which also includes a payment of pay more than USD9 million of restitution to victim customers, including firms affiliated with recipients of federal bailout funds through the Troubled Asset Relief Program.
 
The government’s investigation revealed that RBS – principally from its trading floor in Stamford, Connecticut – perpetrated a scheme from 2008 to 2013 to defraud its customers in trades of residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) and collateralised loan obligations (CLOs). The purpose and effect of RBS’s fraud was to increase its profits on RMBS and CLO trades at the expense of victim customers. RBS conducted this scheme by, through and with its employees, who acted with the knowledge, encouragement and participation of RBS supervisors or its compliance-related personnel.
 
RBS conducted its scheme in various ways. Firstly, RBS misrepresented material facts to deceive and cheat its customers in trades. For instance, in certain transactions, RBS lied to the buyer about the seller’s asking price (or vice versa), keeping the difference between the price paid by the buyer and the price paid to the seller for RBS. In other transactions, RBS misrepresented to the buyer that bonds held in RBS’s inventory were being offered for sale by a fictitious third-party seller, which allowed RBS to charge the buyer an extra, unearned commission.
 
Secondly, RBS instructed its RMBS and CLO traders in, and caused them to use, fraudulent trading practices.
 
Thirdly, RBS lied to victims who detected or suspected that they had been the victims of fraud. Fourthly, RBS ignored or refused to act on complaints by its own employees who were not part of the scheme. Fifthly, RBS used its purportedly independent proprietary trading operation, known as its “prop desk,” as an arm of its RMBS and CLO trading desk in order to deceive rival broker-dealers in trades, including by allowing its RMBS and CLO traders to direct the prop desk’s negotiations in the sale of bonds. Finally, RBS concealed its fraudulent conduct from its customers, and from its own employees who were not participants in the scheme, in order to prevent or delay discovery.
 
“For years, RBS fostered a culture of securities fraud,” says Deirdre M Daly, United States Attorney for the District of Connecticut. “Those in a position of authority taught and encouraged fraudulent trading practices. Worse, those supervisors and compliance personnel then took steps to prevent victims and honest RBS employees from discovering and exposing the scheme. After our joint investigation into fixed income trading began, RBS saw the error of its ways. RBS was able to avoid criminal charges in this case only because of its voluntary self-reporting and extraordinary cooperative efforts. By entering into this agreement, RBS has admitted the seriousness of its past criminal conduct and made a clean break. This is another step in our continuing joint effort to make clear to broker-dealers that lying to customers to increase profits is a crime, and that only by rooting out and reporting such misconduct on their own trading floors can they avoid significant criminal liability. We thank SIGTARP and Connecticut FBI for their excellent work on this important case.”
 
“This investigation uncovered that RBS officials committed a long-running scheme to increase profits by defrauding customers, including TARP banks,” says Christy Goldsmith Romero, Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program. “I applaud RBS’s prompt decision to cooperate fully with SIGTARP’s investigation that, in addition to this settlement, helped lead to the convictions of an RBS trader and an RBS supervisor. RBS’s cooperation in SIGTARP’s investigation and subsequent actions to right this wrong are the correct response when federal law enforcement shows up. US Attorney Deirdre Daly has my deep gratitude as she and her team have stood steadfast with SIGTARP as a leader in fighting RMBS crime related to TARP.”
 
“It is incredibly troubling that RBS supervisors participated in and encouraged lower level employees to commit securities fraud, then took steps to prevent honest employees from reporting their concerns,” says FBI Special Agent in Charge Ferrick. “Had RBS not decided to self-report and cooperate, it would have faced much harsher consequences for its egregious criminal conduct. The US Attorney’s Office, SIGTARP and the FBI have forged a formidable partnership in our investigation into fraud in the RMBS and related markets.”
 
The agreement addresses only the corporate criminal liability of RBS Securities Inc., not potential criminal charges for any individual. The criminal investigation of individuals associated with RBS’s trading activities remains open. 
 
On 11 March, 2015, Matthew Katke, a registered broker-dealer and managing director at RBS, pleaded guilty to conspiracy to commit securities fraud and began cooperating with the government. On 21 December, 2015, Adam Siegel, the Co-Head of US Asset-Backed Securities, Mortgage-Backed Securities and Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities Trading at RBS, pleaded guilty to the same charge and also began cooperating.
 
This matter is being investigated by the Special Inspector General for the Troubled Asset Relief Program and the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant US Attorneys Jonathan Francis and Heather Cherry.
 
This case received support from the Financial Fraud Enforcement Task Force, a federal and state law enforcement effort focused on investigating and prosecuting significant financial crimes and on recovering proceeds for victims of financial crimes.

Like this article? Sign up to our free newsletter

FEATURED

MOST RECENT

FURTHER READING

Please select one of the below *
Notify Me
Firm Type *
Please select below
Terms & Conditions *
Privacy Policy *