When one looks at the numbers, it would appear that 2003 was When one looks at the numbers, it would appear that 2003 was an easy year for investors. Equity markets were up strongly, emerging market fixed income up almost 30%, gold up 20%, commodities such as oil and copper up around 45%, and developed market bonds up some 3%. However, the fact is that 2003 was a tough year for investors due to a number of unusual risks that made implementing investment strategies more difficult than usual.  Those risks included the threat of war with The risks of war and deflation were especially troubling for investors as the downside of these could be large and uncertain. The main assault in The threat of deflation was even more distressing for some investors last year than that of war. Deflation, as seen in For now, the threat of deflation has receded.  Gold, a leading inflation indicator, is above USD 400 per ounce.  Commodity prices are up. Deflation in Most importantly, the Whereas, war, deflation risks and a nasty bear market in equities made investing during 2003 difficult for investors, the diminution of those risks make investing during 2004 less problematic. Therefore, we are back to "normal," but with a few 21st century twists.  This means investors can re-focus on underlying big picture trends, which include: Technology, Globalization, Free Market Economics, Global Demographics and, The Development of China. To some extent, investors have already refocused and discounted some of the information embedded in these trends, explaining some of the positive market results for 2003.  However, for 2004, investors are going to become more intent on understanding and discounting what is new about the 21st century. " The fact remains that technology is fundamentally changing many things, and that trend is accelerating, not decelerating.  One compelling way that technology is changing life is in the area of work and jobs. An economist at a large mutual fund company produced a report during the year that noted the However, the study concluded that It is not just that the Further, the practice of outsourcing higher-level white collar and tech jobs is also becoming more prevalent due to the confluence of telecommunication improvements, the Internet, and globalization trends.  Job growth should pick up during 2004 given the amount of stimulus in the system already.  But, job creation will become more of an issue during 2004 as the Fed is faced with an expanding economy, and job growth remaining below what is normally expected during an economic recovery.  The debate will be further inflamed by political rhetoric during an election year. Another twist of the twenty-first century includes the development of Investors in the early 21st century confront a widening US fiscal and trade deficits.  2004 will be a year that investors are forced to consider these imbalances more directly.  2003 proved to be kind a “free pass” year.  The dollar declined, but not enough to trouble the Specifically, this means the following: 1.             The 2.             2003 marks the end of aggressive central bank easing, and 2004 the beginning of central bank tightening 3.             Range bound bond markets will ultimately sell off, and yield curves will flatten, though the sell-off will be moderate, unless the dollar really starts to collapse 4.             The twin 5.             The 6.             Inflationary expectations will move up, along with further moves in commodities 7.             Expensive equity markets will become more expensive. Summary The year 2004 will see a stronger global economy.  The shifting cost of money in the global economy will present numerous investment opportunities in relative value and directional fixed income markets, as well as for global macro related trades. By William Lawton, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer, Seagate Global Advisors. Seagate manages the SeaMax Partners Fund, a USD 30 million global macro fixed income fund, up 43% net for 2003. copyright hedgeweek 2004